December 4, 2007
Mitt Romney and Mormonism and Abortion (Peter Fenn)
OK, I have had enough. Mitt Romney is just too much. At the CNN YouTube debate he answered the question of his so-called “switch” on abortion.
Here is some of what he said: “I was wrong. I was effectively pro-choice when I ran for office … I changed my mind as governor.” He talked about “a mistake.”
This is complete nonsense. This has all been totally and crassly calculated from the first day he announced against Edward Kennedy (D) for the U.S. Senate and when he sought out and received a pro-choice Republicans group’s endorsement in the 2002 governor’s race. The same group that, by the way, is running very tough ads against him in Iowa and New Hampshire.
His rhetoric and his issue positions were without nuance: “I support a woman’s right to choose in this country” … “I will sustain and support Roe v. Wade” … “I will preserve and protect a woman’s right to choose.” You can watch a wonderful collection of clips on YouTube. About 10 years’ worth.
He supported state funding for abortions. He was unequivocal … until he started running for president. Or was he?
Here is one fact that few have discussed: Mitt Romney is a sincere and serious member of a church, the Church of Latter-Day Saints, the Mormons, who have a very strict and very consistent policy on abortion: It should be legal in this country only in the cases of life of the mother, rape and incest. That is it. They do not support Roe v. Wade, they are absolutely opposed to funding; opposition to abortion is a basic tenet of the LDS Church.
Mormonism is key to Mitt Romney — his great-great-grandfather, Miles Romney, became a leader in the church in 1837. Mitt Romney went on a two-year mission for the church to France, and spent 12 years in top leadership in the church, 1982 to 1985 as a bishop, equivalent to a lay pastor. For nine years he was a stake president, overseeing dozens of parishes. To his credit, he has been very active in his church and tithed 10 percent of his yearly income, a considerable sum in his case. All five sons attended LDS-run Brigham Young University in Utah.
My simple point is this: Mitt Romney is not just a casual churchgoer but a true believer in the doctrine of his church. I cannot fathom for one moment that his entire embracing of a woman’s right to choose when he ran for office was anything other than a total fraud, a total rejection of his teachings and beliefs.
He never “changed his mind,” was “wrong” or “made a mistake” — he was just trying to pull the wool over the eyes of the people of Massachusetts. And the same was true for being “more pro-gay rights than Ted Kennedy.” Also a complete fraud.
Mitt Romney was not true to his beliefs and his church when he ran for office in 1994 or 2002. My guess is that Mormons in Massachusetts and elsewhere know precisely where Romney stood … and that he precipitated this fraud with a wink and a prayer.
So when we listen to Romney as the man who looked into his conscience and changed his views, we should think Elmer Gantry.
Permalink TrackBack
Email This Post
Share this post
What's This 4 Comments
»
The Hill welcomes comment from anyone and will almost always post it whether it is favorable or critical, as long as it is substantive and advances debate.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
























Peter;
Instead of this piece on Mitt, why aren't you writing about Bush's lies about the fake Iranian nukes. I find it curious that all of you have pass up this explosive piece of news. For months now, Bush has been telling everyone that Iran had nukes and now that the NIE has called him a liar, you all have clammed up. What a bunch of weasels you all are.
Comment by Mike Coleman — December 4, 2007 @ 3:44 pm
Geez Mike — give me a break, I wrote this yesterday. I do have a day job! And I was on the Situation Room today blasting Bush for his WWW III comments and Bolton for his predictions of a "holocaust" — pushing hard that this should take invading Iran off the table. You and I agree Bush is the king of denial and once again, is caught up in his own neo-con world. Who could ever trust this guy after the last 7 years?
Comment by peter fenn — December 4, 2007 @ 9:40 pm
Just cause we didn't find any nukes in iraq, doesnt mean they weren't there. Use your brain… Things can be moved and happen. Granted I am not a Bush supporter but stop blasting him, hes on his way out of office anyway. Just smile and wave goodbye like a good little democrat.
tim
http://UriahMinistries.wordpress.com
Comment by tim — December 5, 2007 @ 10:45 am
[...] And wields the scalpel… And the end always justify the means. The ideological pandering is now legendary. When Romney ran for the Senate in Massachusetts he was at least as strong a proponent of abortion as his opponent, Ted Kennedy, and was more libertarian than him on gay rights. He then kick started his presidential campaign by reviving an ancient Jim Crow law to put the brakes on same sex marriage in the Bay State. He denounced the ideology of Ronald Regan, and then had the audacity to trash Huckabee as being no Ronald Reagan. As a gubernatorial candidate he had no use for the NRA and praised Massachusetts' heavy handed regulation of firearms. But he has now joined the NRA and is a big time Second Amendment advocate. Even though apparently Romney is a staunch Mormon, he is unable to stay true to the the tenets of his faith, when personal opportunity comes knocking. What a piece of work. [...]
Pingback by USA: A Gay and Lesbian Voters Guide, and a Downer on Mitt Romney | The Wardman Wire — January 28, 2008 @ 6:25 am