Pundit_Sidebar

May 16, 2008

David Rubenstein and Private Equity, Part II (Kathy Kemper)

@ 11:11 am

During a recent Institute for Education/INFO forum, David Rubenstein, co-founder of the Carlyle Group, discussed both the economy and bananas — often in the same sentence. Rubenstein himself is quite humble and self-deprecating for a man on Forbes’s Top 400 Wealthiest People list, and much more sober than expected when diagnosing the economy.

Rubenstein first quoted Hollywood producer Bo Goldman, saying that “nobody here knows anything” when discussing economic issues. He also related a story about Alfred Kahn, an adviser to Jimmy Carter, who used the “R word" (recession) during the 1980 campaign before being asked to stop. Kahn acquiesced and instead began saying, “We are approaching a banana,” since no reporter would write that in his or her column. Somewhat like the chastened Kahn, Rubenstein was hesitant to use the “R word.”

Media today are very biased towards getting tag words for their headlines, and not very focused on what is ultimately important to people. An economic downturn certainly affects millions of people negatively, whether or not it is a bona fide recession. The important thing from a public relations point of view is the name that is given to the downturn when the stories hit the newsstands.

Avoiding the “R” word is not the only example of this selective naming (Frank Luntz might call it framing) — just about everything is named in strategic ways. For example, the recent tax rebates given out are called a “stimulus package” rather than a "debt increaser." We call the increase in troops a “surge” in Iraq, while in Vietnam it was an “escalation,” a much less pleasing name for a similar thing.

Calling something a “banana” rather than a “recession” is more than just a political tool, it is also astute factualness because, as Rubenstein explained, it is rather difficult to know when a recession is actually happening. It often takes a year or more after a recession has ended before the National Bureau of Economic Analysis can diagnose a downturn as a recession. Recessions are not necessarily just the simple definition we learn in school of “two consecutive quarters of negative growth,” and it is very difficult to know when we are in one.

All that Rubenstein would concede was that we may be in or approaching a “banana.” He does not think that the downturn — whatever you call it — has ended yet, and believes that banks need another year or two to realize all their losses and remove the debt from their balance sheets. Furthermore, Rubenstein believes that who ultimately wins the presidential race will have little effect on the downturn. Whoever the next commander in chief is, he or she will be locked into a “budgetary straitjacket” and unable to change the outcome much.

Finally, Rubenstein expressed confidence in the American economy over the long term. Economic downturns are natural, like a baby before sleep who may cry when tired, but once he falls asleep everything is wonderful again. Regrettably, we are suffering the pain now, but soon the economy will turn around and lots of irresponsible lending practices will have been ousted in the process. As a country, we just need to wait for this “banana” to split.

Kathy Kemper is founder and CEO of the Institute for Education, a nonprofit foundation that recognizes and promotes leadership and civility locally, nationally and in the world community.

Archived under: Economy & Budget
Permalink TrackBack EMail This Post


Share this post
del.icio.us:David Rubenstein and Private Equity, Part II digg:David Rubenstein and Private Equity, Part II newsvine:David Rubenstein and Private Equity, Part II reddit:David Rubenstein and Private Equity, Part II fark:David Rubenstein and Private Equity, Part II Y!:David Rubenstein and Private Equity, Part II What's This



6 Comments »

The Hill welcomes comment from anyone and will almost always post it whether it is favorable or critical, as long as it is substantive and advances debate.

  1. Sorry to disappoint all the liberals, but we haven't hit a recession. Someone from the Carter administration has nerve even showing their face at an economic convention, much less trying to discuss anything. Carter had the worst economy in the last 50 years. That's like going to an ethics convention with the former managers at Enron.

    Comment by Robert Rosencrans — May 16, 2008 @ 11:55 am

  2. One other point. The national debt isn't increased with the rebates. The national debt is only increased through additional spending. The rebates were a form of a tax cut, since only taxpayers got it as opposed to bureaucrats.

    Comment by Robert Rosencrans — May 16, 2008 @ 11:57 am

  3. How about if we start referring to the Federal Reserve as "a useless institution with inordinate control over the economy responsible to no one that got us into the Internet stock and haousing bubbles". Do you think maybe someone will print it?

    Comment by Igor R. — May 16, 2008 @ 12:26 pm

  4. Igor: Read the Creature from Jekyll Island. If you haven't already. I agree. The Federal Reserve is a monopoly on money and I'm surprised no one has tried to take them down with private equity.

    Comment by Robert Rosencrans — May 16, 2008 @ 3:13 pm

  5. Robert, thanks I will. I just read "Greenspan's Bubbles", it's very good. I read it after I said the Federal Reserve caused both of the two big bubbles of the last ten years, and the book said it word for word blaming Greenspan directly, and a lot more.

    The funniest thing is all these tugs of war about which President did what to/for the economy, and they are like paddle-boaters in the middle of constantly changing hurricanes instrumented by the Federal Reserve which responds to no one. And now we have a guy in charge who a couple of years ago was highly concerned about stopping deflation.

    Comment by Igor R. — May 16, 2008 @ 4:38 pm

  6. The reason this one is different is because banks will not give up their 20% & 30% interest rates (which compound to as much as 40%-50% per years.

    Not only is the american consumer indentured, but the profits are then used to fund start up companies in other countries. This is a foul situation that cannot just be band aided.

    Additionally, Oil profits that go to buy more oil wasting and gas guzzling machinery will doom the planet at an ever accelerating rate.

    Comment by Alessandro Machi — May 17, 2008 @ 12:56 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions
rss

The contents of this site are © 2008 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications Inc.