August 27, 2008
The Great Pundit Cable Republican PUMA Fraud (Brent Budowsky)
Yes, indeed, one of the pundits with the latest "Hillary supporters will vote Republican" words admitted she was repeating the GOP talking points, which indeed she was, along with the jib-jab of the cable talkies and the flim-flam of the so-called experts who treat smears as truth and talking points as news.
The "Hillary supporters will vote Republican" myth is a fraud, a figment of the imagination of Fox News, a fantasy of the Hillary-obsessed pundit class, and a mirage that will be shattered when the PUMA Republicans are revealed for the fraud they are and more than 90 percent of the Hillary supporters will vote against more war, against overturning Roe v. Wade and against the economic royalism of the oil company party led by John McCain, who opposes equal pay for women while he would privatize Social Security for the elderly.
The pundits chortled when a Gallup poll showed McCain pulling ahead, but they are silent when the next Gallup poll showed Barack back on top.
Here's the catch. When CNN dredged up that African-American Hillary delegate saying she would give Barack Obama two months to prove his worth to her, that woman will end up voting for Obama and is counted in the bogus math of the alleged "Hillary supporters will vote for McCain.” In fact, the polls that show Obama slightly ahead count NONE of those alleged "Hillary voters" as Obama voters when in truth MOST of them will be.
In short, they are already being counted AGAINST Barack, yet when there is movement in their numbers, it will be TO Barack.
Let’s be clear. This convention has not dealt with economic or energy issues, as it should have. Democrats are in the fight of their lives. Make no mistake about that.
But make no mistake about this, either. No matter how many times the pundits repeat the Republican talking points, no matter how much the cable talkies are obsessed with Hillary, no matter how much propaganda is spread by the Republicans and repeated on the cables as news or by the pundits as wisdom, the truth is this …
The PUMAs are nothing but a fraud who speak for no one except a handful of people and Republicans who support them, promote them, and try to sell them to the press as they once sold Mr. Chalabi as the future of Iraqi democracy and once sold Jack Abramoff as the go-to power guy in Washington.
It is fraud, it is a sham, it is a myth — and don’t believe anyone who tells you otherwise.
Permalink TrackBack
Email This Post
Share this post
What's This 55 Comments
»
The Hill welcomes comment from anyone and will almost always post it whether it is favorable or critical, as long as it is substantive and advances debate.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
I repeat what I commented on another post I
wrote. I have a Republican source who
donated money (a significant amount) to one
of these "Hillary Republican" frauds at an
event organized by another Republican and
attended by other Republicans. I cant use
it because the information was given to me
under the condition I not identify this person
but I am working on a second source. I flat
out predict this will be in the news soon,
either I get the story first or another news
organization and I am collaborating with other
media on this. Just watch.
Comment by Brent — August 27, 2008 @ 5:42 pm
This statement is appalling about the black lady interviewed by CNN. How does anyone know "that woman will end up voting for Obama"? Because she's black? Or, because of Barack's brown shirts thugs? Night of long knives?
Should we be worried about her physical safety as she takes a cab to Denver airport?
Comment by Misha — August 27, 2008 @ 5:51 pm
I guess that beats an unrepentent terrorist donating money and holding a fundraiser to launch Barack Obama's political career. Republican's for PUMAs, terrorists for Obama, just your average political theater.
Comment by Igor R. — August 27, 2008 @ 5:55 pm
A proud PUMA explains her rationale: is she a fraud???
http://www.startribune.com/opinion/commentary/27505279.html?elr=KArksc8P:Pc:U0ckkD:aEyKUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aULPQL7PQLanchO7DiU
Comment by Igor R. — August 27, 2008 @ 6:01 pm
Who needs a Republican case against Obama? He has constructed his own temple of doom. Talk about a political suicide!
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN2636979020080826
Comment by Igor R. — August 27, 2008 @ 6:17 pm
Brent,
OK, I think there is something in your vodka…I mean water.
We will see late in the night of Nov 4 and I fully expect you to lead the charges of voter fraud on Nov.5 when Obama is defeated.
I see why you are always knocking Fox news because you have high regard for Olbermann and think he is a "journalist". ROFLMAO
Comment by Jon Pemberton — August 27, 2008 @ 6:30 pm
Igor if you are going to talk about old
relationships, what you do think of Charles
Keating and the various super-crooks in the
S and L scandal that almost got McCain thrown
out of the Senate, and worse. Didn't McCain
have a financial relationship with this
unsavory S and L crowd through his wife's
money and business? Come on, deal with this
straight, aren't you appalled by McCain's
behavior with the S and L's?
Comment by Brent — August 27, 2008 @ 6:43 pm
Remember this? This looks like what made Obama think up his temple of doom:
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=080722221541.itdi1dcz&show_article=1
Comment by Igor R. — August 27, 2008 @ 6:44 pm
Obama and Iran: a link?
http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=13760
Comment by Igor R. — August 27, 2008 @ 7:04 pm
Brent
I will admit I am not clear on how the delegate process worked tonight, however watching state by state issue their votes a total of 1549 votes went to Obama and 341 votes to HRC. CA passed, IL passed, NM yielded to IL and then IL yielded to NY at which time HRC asked for acclimation. The remaining states counts were not given. Up till Hillary requested acclimation she had 20% of the delegate votes. I believe for the sake of party solidarity HRC's delegate went to Obama.
This is significant.
So, let us see what happens. Perhaps the PUMA's are underestimating their guesses.
See you Thursday at the Greek Temple,
Comment by JFK-HRC — August 27, 2008 @ 7:10 pm
This man trusted Barack enough let him head the foundation he co-founded. Do you trust Barack?
http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/08/26/obama-associate-bill-ayers-unrepentant-for-acts-of-terror/
Comment by Igor R. — August 27, 2008 @ 7:15 pm
There is one thing funny in this.
In an attempt to turn the social security trust fund over to Wall Street the republicans have spent millions of dollars to tell me exactly what I have paid into social security over the years.
If they succeed in "privatisation" I want a check in that amount. As a matter of fact I will sue to be refunded the money I have paid in, along with probably one hundred million other people.
Oh, I'm self-employed. Put that money in the hands of Wall Street and I'll never pay another dime.
John McCain is unqulified to be a Senator just as he was unqualified to be a pilot.
Comment by Jim — August 27, 2008 @ 7:18 pm
I agree with you that the phenomenon of Hillary-for-McCain supporters is completely trumped and overrated. So several hundred naysayers protested because Hillary lost? Big deal. Given that both Obama and Clinton have similar platforms and plans to execute those policies, it goes without saying that anyone willing to vote against his/her own principles operates on spite and not logic anyway.
I'll be curious to see if these same pundits will offer non-stop coverage and analysis of Ron Paul's 10,000-seat-sold-out-rally to boycott the Republican Convention next week. Can we expect to hear repeatedly how broken beyond repair the Republican machine has become? Can we expect them to hang on to Ron Paul's every last move in case he wrinkles his nose when McCain's name is mentioned? It only seems fair to offer quality time to a much larger, much more organized movement than the Hillary-first folks have going on.
Comment by Melissa — August 27, 2008 @ 7:36 pm
Surely these contacts were financed by Republicans:
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/08/annenberg_documents_show_exten.html
Comment by Igor R. — August 27, 2008 @ 7:59 pm
Brent, lots of luck trying to convince Igor to care about anything reasonable, or for that matter, even truthful.
He continually scrapes the bottom of the barrel to come up with the most outrageous slanders against Obama.
He is just another part of the disinformation talking points cadre who will stoop to any level to further the election of McSame. I don't need to tell you that Rosencrans, Misha, etc are coming from the same slimy place.
Keep up the good work, Brent!
Yours is the one column that I can always count on to be at least truthful in what you write. Sorry about the absolutely disgraceful rantings of the Feeherys and Heyes and others that share this blog.
Comment by smilinjack — August 27, 2008 @ 8:13 pm
smilinjack, all the "terrorist" information is factual. Bottom of the barrel? Barack Obama is the bottom of the barrel for what is considered acceptable in a politician, in fact he is below the bottom of the barrel. Terrorists have no place anywhere in the social circle of American politicians.
Comment by Igor R. — August 27, 2008 @ 9:26 pm
your party is divided, Dems.
HRC had to call her people off tonite…
how can that NOT equate to swing-votes for mccain?
we're not talking about the eco-femmes, we're talking about working class people, you know, the people obama called "clingy"
Comment by bulky boxer — August 27, 2008 @ 11:59 pm
Igor,
You are an idiot.
Comment by greydog — August 28, 2008 @ 1:18 am
JFK-HRC, I'll ask again, why dont you post
your real name so we can see if you are truly
a Democratic? C'mon, have courage, I use my
real name even for comments. The maneuvering
on the roll call was for one simple purpose,
to time Hillary's call for acclamation to
be live on the network news. smilingjack,
I know I am not going to persuade Igor and
Co, I'm just being the nice guy while
Melissa stomps them into the ground, haha.
Comment by Brent — August 28, 2008 @ 7:25 am
It is just Not True that convention did not deal with Economic and other solutions, a total myth fed by the MSM.
"Watch C-SPAN for convention coverage and get yourself psychically cleared. Stop watching TV. The MSM is desperately working to program us morning noon and night. And creating despair amongst those who are openly hopeful about 2008 politics is very easy. Just bust the bubble that gives you room to believe that change can happen and the rest falls away. Including your own sense of self-empowerment. Believe it.”
Comment by angellight — August 28, 2008 @ 8:25 am
Last night's convention reinforces your point Brent. Spot on.
John McSame has been wrong, Obama has been right all along.
Yes we can!
Comment by Lester — August 28, 2008 @ 8:48 am
Brent, all they do all day long on cable tv and AM radio is repeat Rove-approved talking points. You could turn on the radio at this very moment and hear the newest one. Perception management and control of the public mind is absolutely necessary for the construction of fascist oligarchial corporate dictatorship.
Whoever controls the media controls the country. Period.
The mother of all media scandals broke less than six months ago and it got scant attention, even from the progressive blogosphere. And I bet at first thought it doesn't even come to your mind.
Every major media outlet, ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN put retired generals on the air without telling their audience that they were prepped with talking points by the Pentagon and had ties to Defense Contractors. These Generals all green-lighted the War in Iraq. It had to be fought they told us. If these wise Generals said War was necessary how could the public refute their wisdom?
In short, every major media outlet conducted psy-ops on the American Public (federal crime) to help sell an illegal war to a gullible public.
The broadcasting licenses of every major media should've been instantly revoked and fines in the tens of billions of dollars levied. Remember, Nuremberg told us that the Propagandists are WAR CRIMINALS just as those who execute the war. Yes, that includes Brian Williams, Katie Couric and Wolf Blitzer and many more.
So what has happened as a result of this, the largest media scandal in history? Absolutely nothing. Except these same media were handed spectrum in the new digital televsion signal set to be used exclusively in early 2009. These signals are worth hundreds of billions of dollars. And they were GIVEN to these unscrupulous WAR CRIMINALS without auction or public debate.
I repeat: Whoever controls the media controls the country. Period.
Your PUMA scandal pales in comparison.
Jeff Cohen sums it up nicely:
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/04/28/8560/
Comment by wewillnotbeneoconned — August 28, 2008 @ 9:21 am
Terrorists have no place anywhere in the social circle of American politicians.
Comment by Igor R. — August 27, 2008 @ 9:26 pm
Are you kidding? The Bush's have a 30 year business/social relationship with the Bin Ladens.
The Bush's helped Saudis escape the country after 9/11 when all other air traffic had been grounded and before they had been thoroughly questioned.
Bush's grandfather helped Hitler's war machine obtain finances even AFTER the bombing of Pearl Harbor.
Bush's grandfather also plotted to overthrow the government of President Roosevelt.
http://www.infowars.com/articles/nwo/bush_crime_family_prescott_plotted_fascist_coup.htm
Comment by wewillnotbeneoconned — August 28, 2008 @ 10:25 am
Brent,
Since you keep bringing this up lets lay out ALL the facts..
Remember the Keating 5 was 4 Democrats and one Republican. The ethics committee found much more wrong doing by three of the Democrats. Wasn't it only McCain who testified in the civil lawsuit?
"He got his fanny slapped…"
Really here is the rulings on each of the five.(Democrat controlled Senate).
The Senate Ethics Committee ruled that Cranston had acted improperly by interfering with the investigation by the FHLBB.[16] He had received more than a million dollars from Keating, had done more arm-twisting than the other Senators on Keating's behalf, and was the only Senator officially rebuked by the Senate in this matter.
The Senate Ethics Committee ruled that Riegle and DeConcini had acted improperly by interfering with the investigation by the FHLBB.
The Senate Ethics Committee ruled that the involvement of Glenn in the scheme was minimal, and the charges against him were dropped.[16] He was only criticized by the Committee for "poor judgment."[19]
The Ethics Committee ruled that the involvement of McCain in the scheme was also minimal, and he too was cleared of all charges against him.[17][16] McCain was criticized by the Committee for exercising "poor judgment" when he met with the federal regulators on Keating's behalf.[6] The report also said that McCain's "actions were not improper nor attended with gross negligence and did not reach the level of requiring institutional action against him….Senator McCain has violated no law of the United States or specific Rule of the United States Senate
Geez Brent you are easy to correct..
Comment by Jon Pemberton — August 28, 2008 @ 10:58 am
Jon, you're analysis of Keating 5 is like
Dick Cheney's analysis of Iraq intelligence.
All of them should be criticized, but McCain
is the one running for president, and if you
do your research, and have the integrity and
objectivity to report the truth, McCain was
one of the worst of the Keating 5 offenders.
Though of course you guys dont care about
facts or truth which is why the Republicans
have the brand identity of defective dog food
because word is out.
Comment by Brent — August 28, 2008 @ 11:12 am
Brent;
Good shot!
Comment by Mike Coleman — August 28, 2008 @ 11:51 am
Nice one, Brent! I was just about to school Jon Pembertroll when I scrolled down, and… Voila! And then there's this other fool Igor (I-Trollbot?), posting links to Fox News, as if that were a credible source. Anyways I just wanted to say that I left a comment on a "Just Say No Deal" blog- nothing crude, very mild, but I accused people of being McCain/ Redumblican plants- it was up for 5 minutes and then… Voila! It was gone. So, there you have it- 100% Republican chicanery, you KNOW because they can't take the TRUTH!
Comment by colinjames — August 28, 2008 @ 12:20 pm
I only watched a few minutes of yesterday's Democrat extravaganza
I caught Joe Biden saying (paraphrase) that Russian attacks on Georgia will not be tolerated.
As it was reported everywhere else in the world, but censored in the U.S., Georgia attacked Ossetia first THEN Russia responded.
Joe Biden undoubtedly know this.
If I was an Obama/Biden supporter it'd make me rather uncomfortable that he's embraced a neo-con lie.
From McCain I expect this.
Comment by wewillnotbeneoconned — August 28, 2008 @ 12:46 pm
Brent,
Good job on responding to the vitriolic rantings of republican trolls.
Comment by sharon — August 28, 2008 @ 1:18 pm
To Brent, Mike, and Colinjames,
I provided facts about how the Democrat controlled Ethics Committee ruled and you provided your own opinions.
So the Ethics committe got it wrong?
How was I schooled besides learning what your opinion is?
Comment by Jon Pemberton — August 28, 2008 @ 1:20 pm
SO let me understand this.. Voters are mad at Obamma at how he treated Hillary.. So they will vote for McCain.. John McCain the guy, by his own admission, cheated repeatedly on his first wife.. A wife that was faithful to him while he was a POW but didn't look so pretty when he returned because of an accident she was in… And their vote will put in a first lady who knowingly was seeing a married man.. Yeah you show em…
Comment by Kevin — August 28, 2008 @ 1:40 pm
Since we seem to be recycling this thanks again Jon Pemberton for enlightening us with the facts, still lost on Brent. The truth matters not to the elitists. They selectively block out what doesn't fit their story.
And the Keating 5 analogy sort of reminds one of Hillary Clinton's Whitewater Scandal and her dealings with superwealthy, supercorrupt supercrook operators for whom she acted unethically hiding behind her Law Firm. And then of course of a White House lawyer and a longtime friend of President Clinton and Hillary Rodham Clinton being found dead in the park. Not the first or last death coincidentally associated with crossing the Clintons. By the way she too was running for President and will be again in four more years as well become evident on November 5th, 2008. Move On and their far left backers gave you a loosing horse, attractive, but not up to the looming race. When you get on his heels, he just can't close the deal. History repeats.
Comment by JEdgarSwoop — August 28, 2008 @ 2:08 pm
Let's examine some of the myths perpetuated here with some facts.
First here is a website of average Hillary voters who plan on voting for McCain. I wish them well.
http://hillaryvotersformccain.com/
Here is a link to the latest polls. The most damaging one for Obama is the Gallup poll which shows 9% undecided. That's bad news for Barack because undecided is actually a code term for McCain.
http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/08-us-pres-ge-mvo.php
Comment by Robert Rosencrans — August 28, 2008 @ 2:43 pm
wewillnotbeneoconned, "the Bin Ladens" are not "Osama bin Laden". Your attempt to connect either of the two Presidents with terrorists is just a smear. Neither of them has any terrorist friends. You can write whatever you want about their ancestors, the relatives of their aquaintances, etc, and yet neither of them has ever been appointed by a terrorist to a board of a foundation or had their career launched at a terrorist's house or even invited one to a Thanksgiving dinner at their house.
Comment by Igor R. — August 28, 2008 @ 2:50 pm
greydog, OK, that was highly informative.
Comment by Igor R. — August 28, 2008 @ 2:51 pm
Jon;
Trying to suck up now that Brent slpped you up side the head. You know that you don't present fact, just your own opinion.
Comment by Mike Coleman — August 28, 2008 @ 2:55 pm
Bananas, Banks and Broads
All the above are the Problem for McCain.
Bananas:
OK slimebags, keep bringing up Ayers, he is NOTHING compared to the Bonano Crime Family that McCain is tied to.
Not only is McCain tied to the Bonano crime family, so is his wife and her entire family.
Banks:
Or how bout that little scandal called The Keating Five?
McCain is a crook plain and simple.
Broads:
McCain cheated on his first wife and ran around with Cindy while he was still married.
Now he is cheating on Cindy with a Lobbyist.
You morons make a big thing over the set he plans to accept the nomination on… what is the big frickin deal?
It looks like EVERY building in Washington DC… morons.
Comment by Arliss — August 28, 2008 @ 3:16 pm
Is there are least one Republican here who
has at least one nice thing to say about
John McCain? Come on, guys, this is pathetic.
You treat McCain as though he does not exist.
Is there at least one of you, who has at least
one nice to thing to say about why McCain
would make a good President, LOL?
Comment by Brent — August 28, 2008 @ 3:17 pm
#34, Of course not Igor. That's why the Bin Laden's discreetly pulled out of the Carlyle Group so as to avoid any further association with the Bushies. No connection whatsoever.
Lets invite all the Saudis Bush let escape the country after 9/11 back and have the FBI fully question them.
That'll happen when?
Comment by wewillnotbeneoconned — August 28, 2008 @ 3:25 pm
Who could forget Sy Hersh's bombshell in 2007 that Bush is COVERTLY funding Al Qaeda?
Igor, what was that about no Bush/Cheney relations to terrorists?
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/25/hersh-qaeda/
Comment by wewillnotbeneoconned — August 28, 2008 @ 3:46 pm
Something interesting…On Monday I was able to leave comments on a PUMA website that got a few of these losers a bit upset. Tried again the next day and found that all comments that were negative about PUMA and McCain had been deleted and when I tried to post another comment I was kicked out. So the members of PUMA are not interested in debate, they are not interested in the truth and they are NOT interested in fairness. To them, you only have a right to express your opinion if you agree with them.
Comment by Phyllis — August 28, 2008 @ 4:12 pm
No doubt the pumi are reethugs in drag;no way any self respecting woman would allow McSame control over her privacy and body; not a single taxpayer under $400K could continue paying unfair share.None of that matters. I will vote Obama. 5% Republicans will vote Barr.We will be led by President Barack Obama. You freepers can make all the noise you want but its over for you this election.We've already won!
Comment by Joe C — August 28, 2008 @ 5:48 pm
#19 Brent
You really want my real name ?? You must be writing a book too ! Ha!
I'll tell you this much, I have been a life-long Dem. I am the daughter of a life long Democrat, my father. He too was a Politician. He has passed. I knocked on doors for signatures, licked envelopes for him and his friends during my childhood, celebrated the wins and cried when there were loses… I didn't like the machine then - but grew to love it now.
Brent, that's all your gonna get… for now.
So, I have a question for you:
Where can I get the complete list of the remaining states that would have listed the number of delegates that went to Obama and Hillary, since Hillary asked for the acclamation before they were all announced. The last state to announce the numbers was NJ. NJ presented all 27 delegates to Sen Obama.
Brent, Thank you in advance.
Comment by JFK-HRC — August 28, 2008 @ 9:38 pm
Brent
Ooops …NJ gave 127 delegates to NJ. (Type-o)
Comment by JFK-HRC — August 28, 2008 @ 9:40 pm
Phyllis, that's interesting. PUMA is a fraud,
backed by Republicans, using Democratic cover.
Expect stories on Republican dirty tricks, this
being one of the milder ones.
Comment by Brent — August 28, 2008 @ 9:42 pm
Pemberton:
Did McCain give the money back?
He's another thief who didn't get burned when caught. I wonder how much he'll let his buddies steal if people like you are stupid enough to vote for him.
You actually deserve it but the rest of us don't.
Comment by pghremodeler — August 28, 2008 @ 9:43 pm
when I first heard the word PUMA. I though it was my thing.
I have been pretty disgusted with what passes for "party unity". It pretty much seemed to me that it was Barack Obama selling out to Hillary and the DLC as the price for getting elected.
When he picked Biden as VP, that seemed to wrap up my theory in a pretty red ribbon.
And my reaction to that is "party unity, my ass!"
Now I find that the acronym is being used to represent die-hard Hillary fans.
I like my version better.
Comment by gmpierce — August 28, 2008 @ 9:57 pm
Hillary did a wonderful job! If she had started out this way she would of won Iowa, but she was stuck on the old ways of dirty politics while Obama refused to play the same game and hit her back. Instead he respected her and challenged her on the issues. Maybe all of this was meant to be so the democrats can wake up, fight back and wean out all the Dems, including the female ones who are bias at heart. Could Hillary have succeeded with old government in place? Would she have ended up as a great President? Or would she have simply band aid a few crisis only to see history repeat itself over and over again after she left?
The Democratic party is no longer the party of the KKK. Just like many A. Am who say that they took the word N back to empower themselves, the A. Am and everyone else who is against bigotry has taken the Democratic party and reformed it into the party of the people for the people. How sweet it is! Hillary is set for life in politics no matter what she says from now on. She will become the first female president but after Obama clears all the red tape BS the reps and dems created and show them people can work together and get things started in our lifetime. The old cancerous idea of impossibility is no longer lingering in the minds of the poor, the worker, and the filthy rich who have to adjust and understand profit does not mean profit greed and is no longer a Christian value.
The Republican Party is the party of fear, greed, falsehood, for the wealthy, survival of the fittest, the well connected, the US and THEM, Christian God's Warriors vs true Jesus's followers, bigotry, and government and citizen neglect. They are the pan for PLUTOCRACY.
The Democrats are rising once again to what is the most well crafted comeback in history. They are for all the people - rich or poor, any party, religion, ethnicity and sexual preference you may have. They believe every individual family has a right to choose any religion without harassment, and to privately decide what is best for the family when it comes to rape and the life of the mother or child. These are choices that should never be made by a stranger or one religious body.
With Obama, his administration, and the Democrats we will enter a new era and live up to the promise of what America should be! As of last night Lady Liberty is beaming in New York's harbor knowing her hard work was not in vain and her meaning - lives on.
Comment by Jane — August 28, 2008 @ 11:52 pm
People stop wasting time with these same reich wing retards that go from post to post telling everyone that will listen to their garbage that they will not vote for Obama…. it's old and tired and no one sane will pay them any attention. Remember these idiots voted for the shrub twice.
Comment by Aftermath — August 29, 2008 @ 4:57 am
These liberals are mentally challenged, i.e., RETARDED. The Republican convention is next week and you will hear all kinds of comments then about John McCain.
Comment by Robert Rosencrans — August 29, 2008 @ 5:20 am
#46 Yes he did.
#36 Mike Coleman I listed the Democrat controlled Ethics Committee rulings on the Keating-5. Do you dispute them? Show me a source that is different. Whats your latest 911 conspiracy theory?
Brent,
I like McCain because he was right about the surge that allows the current negotiations for troop withdrawal to happen. If we went the Obama route, we would have quit and left and the country would be in utter chaos.
I like McCain for the Supreme Court justices he will appoint.
I like McCain for his inclusion of drilling in his energy plan.
I like McCain for his position against torture.
I like McCain because he like the founders do not believe in centrallizing all apsects of our lives in Washington.
I also like McCain because you do not…;-)
Comment by Jon Pemberton — August 29, 2008 @ 11:44 am
Pemberton: "I also like McCain because you do not"
What a moron. No wonder you voted twice for the drunk occupying the WhiteHouse. Pemeburton, you might try moving to and living in Dubai as that'd be just to your liken.
Comment by Lester — August 29, 2008 @ 2:06 pm
Lester the Molestor,
Funny how you comment on the on "I like McCain" line that was a joke. Notice the wink at the end of it..
Idiot
Comment by Jon Pemberton — August 30, 2008 @ 9:57 am
PUMA's are a Republican group that is trying to present themselves as part of the democratic party. Period.
EVERYONE KNOWS IT Take that back to your Commander McCain:
Please, Up McCain's Ass!
Comment by polly — September 1, 2008 @ 2:48 am
BRENT
How did you miss the story about the "Republican Welcoming Party", who are really democrats planning to undermine the RNC… You never mentioned that one in your recent blogs… Did you really miss it or what? No one told secretly you…? That was a big one and so far over 300 arrests…(so far). Scarey stuff, voilence and planned kid napping of delegates… Some dirty tricks by the Dems… The LOST PARTY. A-N-I-M-A-L-S.
Comment by JFK-HRC — September 3, 2008 @ 5:45 pm