October 6, 2008
Change Before Depression (Bob Franken)
Here's the new campaign slogan for both presidential candidates: "Change? Maybe it's too late."
That's what it should be, if our politicians were being honest. Of course, they're not. I say "of course" because we Americans have finally realized that we've been played like fools. The trust that's needed to keep us together has been dissolved by the decades of toxic dishonesty. As a nation, as an economy, we are coming unglued.
When the presidential-wannabes talk about change, their proposals fall so pathetically short of what we need to do as a country, one could argue it wouldn't really matter if Sarah Palin took power. She may be vacant, but so what? She's no emptier than the promises the others are making.
We need some blame-placing here, and some robust corrective action. Gosh darn it. I hate to say this, Sarah (May I call you Sarah?), but you have a point. If that point is that Joe Six-Pack and the rest of us have allowed ourselves to be lulled into careless and misplaced trust in a system that became incomprehensible to all but those who exploited it. We have been suckered by the hustlers who tossed us a few crumbs as they stole the rest of the dinner. They don't call them the fat cats for nothing.
What's tragic is that once again we've discovered that slick doesn't necessarily mean capable. Our economy is collapsing because its foundation is a culture of incompetence
So sadly, that "experience" so many tout is malevolent experience, used by those who have it to clumsily enrich themselves at everyone else's expense.
That does NOT mean, as you seem to argue, Sarah, that we should reject the concepts of intellect and knowledge. Those are good things, properly utilized. We should not permit ourselves to be consumed by any Revolution of the Ignorant. We have seen too many historic calamities where careless leaders fanned the flames. To further their own ambitions, they incited those who had been worn down into an emotional state where they were willing, even anxious, to search for dangerous expedients or scapegoats. We don't need that again.
IF rescuing our society is still doable, it will require more than the kind of small change our aspiring leaders are whispering about.
First of all, prosecutors and investigators must pursue all those shady operators who made their millions, and sometimes billions, by operating and benefiting from a secretive financial system that most closely resembled Enron. We also need to seek out and recruit the thousands of honorable practitioners who played by the rules and recruit them to refashion our financial infrastructure, while weeding out the others
From there we go to those loose "change" promises. You want change? Then let's talk about what the next president is going to have to accomplish to bring his country back to life.
He will need to create a progressive tax system that places a much more realistic burden on the wealthy. We need to actually close those grotesque loopholes, no matter how much the beneficiaries bribe our politicians under the guise of campaign contributions.
Speaking of that, he will need to actually do something about campaign financing. It’s mighty hard, in a nation that codifies free expression, but the John McCain efforts simply nibbled around the edges. And he knew it. Right now, government leaders who are beholden to those who pay for their services (the contributors, not the taxpayers) are the biggest obstacles to any meaningful reform.
He must restore sweeping and effective regulation. Even though a federal bureaucracy is sluggish, and intrusive, that's nowhere near as bad as when we allow the free marketeers to police themselves. Even the most gullible of us have been forced to learn that lesson.
The same approach must be applied to our healthcare. Again, there is no doubt a single-payer system will put our medical needs in the hands of more bureaucrats. However, we already have a single-payer system. The "single payer" is that collusive cabal of insurance companies. Or should I call them single NON-payers, whose regard for their customers’ physical health is overridden by the concerns for their corporate health.
We could go on and on. The point is that unless our leaders are willing to restore the middle class and enforce codes of reasonable conduct, then the only change we'll have anymore is the sound of everyone saying, "Buddy, can you spare a dime?”
Visit Mr. Franken's website at www.bobfranken.tv.
Permalink TrackBack
Email This Post
Share this post
What's This 6 Comments
»
The Hill welcomes comment from anyone and will almost always post it whether it is favorable or critical, as long as it is substantive and advances debate.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
























How about pursuing Barney Frank who was boinking a Fanny Mae official while trying to regulate Fanny Mae? And who said that there is no problem there, repeatedly until last year and stopped any attempts to regulate them? How about pursuing Chris Dodd who was the number one recepient of Fanny and Freddy contributions while being the chairman of the committee that regulated them? And finally how about pursuing Barack Obama who said that subprime lending is a fine thing, while being the second highest recepient of Fanny and Freddy contributions after Dodd? And how about getting rid of the whole cabbal?
Comment by Igor R. — October 6, 2008 @ 11:50 pm
If you are a manager tasked with selecting layoff candidates, do the right thing: fire a few Obama supporters and let them know that change is all about!
Comment by Metamucil — October 7, 2008 @ 1:54 am
The last eight years of republican rule have been horrific. We can't even wait for January for our new president and his Treasury people to start to do something. This 'bailout' helps the few at the top only. Deregulation has made of mess of everything. If you have a basketball game, you need referees, don't you. Too many rules and regulation are not healthy for business, but this republican rule with the most spending ever by Bush has damaged us to the hilt. Vote for change. This is worldwide and we need a respected leader and you know who that is. VOTE!
Comment by Joyce — October 7, 2008 @ 1:57 am
Central economic planning always fails, no matter who plans it, for whatever reason it was planned, it is doomed to fail. The Community Reinvestment Act was a perfect example of that.
Comment by Robert Rosencrans — October 7, 2008 @ 8:46 am
Joyce, you forgot that he wants to drastically increase spending. Does that make sense to you or you just love his dreamy gaze?
Comment by Igor R. — October 7, 2008 @ 2:41 pm
#5. Igor: The only dreamy gaze I love is my husband's.
I stand by my comments.
Comment by Joyce — October 7, 2008 @ 6:03 pm