October 14, 2008
Lipstick on an Election (Bob Franken)
It's time to go out on a limb and consider the possibility that the Obama-Biden ticket might win the election.
The reason to go so boldly where no one has gone before — almost — is that Democrats need to start thinking about giving credit to those who are most responsible for their victory. Those would be the women.
Say what you will about a superior campaign organization, the huge fundraising advantage, the cratering economy. The two guys who will be taking over (I think) owe their success to the females. Think about where they would be were it not for …
Sarah Palin She was at first considered a master stroke (pun intended) by the nihilists who ran John McCain's operation. For a while Sarah stopped Barack/Joe in their tracks and breathed new life into the McCain campaign with her combination of looks, TV sports-anchor moves, Hockey Mom shtick and, oh yeah, gender. But it didn't take all that long before all those so attracted to her lowest-common-denominator fresh face realized she was little more than a cynical ploy — and a vacuous one at that. The responsibility for that goes in large part to …
Kate Couric Katie did her fundamental job. She just asked questions and then follow-ups. We are not talking off-the-wall topics. They were the most rudimentary ones imaginable, offering Gov. Palin an easy shot to demonstrate she was not a bubblehead. Alas, Sarah didn't do well. Of course, Ms. Couric had the advantage of being a "Ms.,” which meant that none of the Republican opportunists could play their flim-flam sexism card. That ploy became so quickly transparent it disgusted the most frustrated Hillary supporters and sent them racing back to the Democratic ticket. It also provided tremendous material for …
Tina Fey Palin's act was so astonishing that Fey needed to rely only on her brilliant impressionistic talent. The actual material wrote itself. Tina Fey got laughs by merely channeling Sarah Palin. In the process she exposed the Palin routine as the act of a Republican Party desperate to make people stop pondering whether John McCain would simply extend the Bush presidency. Rarely, if ever, has this nation been so consumed by a desire for change, at least not since the 1700s. It is so intense it has overridden the disappointment over thwarted ambitions that is still burning inside …
Hillary Clinton Even though her career of public service is still in front of her, she can already take satisfaction for ending, once and for all, any debate about whether a woman can lead this country. The effort to exploit female progress with anti-female tokenism fell with a thud thanks, in large part, to the example set by Hillary. She went toe to toe with Obama and the other candidates during the long, long primary season. No gimmicks required.
We're seeing a huge amount of history in this campaign. We'll be seeing a lot more, including, we can only hope, the glass ceiling, with its 18 million cracks, shattered once and for all. We won't elect a female president in 2008, but any sane person can see there's no reason not to. To a large degree, they set the agenda this time around. Now it's time for them to claim full equality, to be judged strictly on their qualifications. It's time for all those who use subterfuge to undermine this reality to step aside or be run over by progress.
Visit Mr. Franken's website at www.bobfranken.tv.
Permalink TrackBack
Email This Post
Share this post
What's This 7 Comments
»
The Hill welcomes comment from anyone and will almost always post it whether it is favorable or critical, as long as it is substantive and advances debate.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
And yet Sarah Palin seems to draw the crowds almost an order of magnitude better than McCain. And SHE is the one who would be responsible for a McCain loss?
Comment by Igor R. — October 14, 2008 @ 2:53 pm
THIS woman donated to, and has voted for Senator Obama [early voting]. We women don't want anymore old, male, warmongers in the highest office. ENOUGH! ENOUGH!
Comment by Joyce — October 14, 2008 @ 6:59 pm
Want someone who can answer Couric's questions and not be ruffled?
Why don't we just 'sift' through all the brilliant minds who created and profited from the current finacial mess, then find a HONEST person amongst them who'd be willing to run on a presidential ticket.
Got a nominee?
As for Tina Fey, I'd enjoy watching her emulate Pailn the next 4 years.
After all its 'just' entertainment, correct?
Comment by Bill — October 15, 2008 @ 6:20 am
I just can't wait until the 18 million morally compelled feminists take action on NOW's singular purpose of electing "a" woman to the White House, thus proving all the pudits like Franken wrong.
If this does not occur, morally and ethically NOW and other purely feminist organizations ought be compelled to shutter their doors for lack of purpose. (Philosophers take note of the use of "ought" here, you know what I mean.)
Comment by CEO — October 15, 2008 @ 9:16 am
Sarah is a breath of fresh air in this election. I'm a retired Union guy and a Democrat, I'm voting a straight Republican slate this year.The party has been handed over to Soros and Moveon.org. I will change my affiliation to Republican after this election, I would never vote for a far-left Liberal, ever!
Comment by Bill Marshall — October 15, 2008 @ 12:23 pm
1) Bill, take note, Liberal is not a four letter word.
2) Sarah's addition to the R ticket is nothing but a nod to the flat-earthers. For shame on such pandering.
3) Things are mess, thanks to the "conservative" (not hardly) nonsense that's gone on. When I see pro-lifers out picketing against war, they may have a little credence with me. Obama and Biden have my vote. Their plumbing has nothing to do with it.
Comment by Pat — October 15, 2008 @ 3:34 pm
Pat, liberals believe that the fruits of one person's labor need to be forcibly confiscated to be given to another. In that way, they are like Nazis.
I am an atheist and don't believe in any of the religious stuff Sarah believes in. Yet I find that her honesty and concern for restoring that honesty to government, and getting rid of corruption DEMONSTRATED BY HER RECORD is indeed a breath of fresh air. I find her ability to speak plainly on Barack's associations without McCain's false modesty a breath of fresh air. I find her simple understanding that Ahmadenijad is evil without a lot of nuance like Obama's a breath of fresh air. In all of those ways, regardless of our religious disagreements she is a nod to me.
To call what Bush did "conservative" defies the definition of conservatism: small government, no government interference in the economy, strict adherence to the Constitutionally enumerated rights. To attack that philosophy by false accusations in order to install a raging Marxist is pure evil.
Comment by Igor R. — October 15, 2008 @ 6:14 pm